TriPollar

TriPollar

rayoflight2023-05-21T09:12:44.000Z
They are very neutered, so whether you pick radio frequency or laser, or whatever else, they +
won't compare to the more powerful devices used by dermatologists/surgeons. Probably so that people don't damage their skin because the ''real'' versi
rayoflight2022-12-20T02:20:05.000Z
Microcurrent and radio-frequency do different things and over differing time-frames +
and RF is more grounded in science while MC is less well-researched and I find most of the claims aren't true (regardless of what device). One of the
rayoflight2022-12-19T21:00:34.000Z
Well, there is this Nooance 2% copper peptides product that keeps showing up on my +
feed (it keeps calling my name due to the various other ingredients such as glucans and dextran), but it's not really 2% copper peptide, but rather a
rayoflight2022-12-10T22:33:18.000Z
Nah, there are other at-home gadgets that are within the same price range(s) that +
offer more bang for money. Micro-current (Nuface, Ziip, Foreo, 7E) or radio-frequency (Newa, Tripollar, Panasonic) - those are things that great for s
rayoflight2022-11-07T01:25:20.000Z
I wouldn't necessary go for $$$ cosmetics, unless I really liked the texture. There's not really +
anything in a $500 cream/serum that is that much better, the sensory ingredients aside, the stuff that changes how the ingredient mix looks and feels
rayoflight2022-10-14T22:42:51.000Z
Definitely. Cosmetics are just that, and they aren't really meant to do much, otherwise +
the products and the ingredients have to labelled as drugs and that would mean having to prove the things actually live up to the claims with, are get
poreblaster20002021-12-26T16:11:51.000Z
RF home devices - any recos? Looking at the Evenskyn Lumo or the MBK Curve. Tried Newa and was not i
Newa RF is only 50-60 Hz. MBK Curve RF is 300 kHz. Lumo RF is 1 Mhz. Not sure if the Hz is a good measure but maybe why I never saw any results with